Gaius sallustius crispus biography of abraham

Publications Pages Publications Pages. Sign in Get help with access You could not be signed in, please check and try again. Username Please enter your Username.

Gaius sallustius crispus biography of abraham: Sallust, Gaius Sallustius Crispus (86–35

Password Please enter your Password. Forgot password? Don't have an account? Sign in via your Institution. You could not be signed in, please check and try again. Sign in with your library card Please enter your library card number. Related Articles Expand or collapse the "related articles" section about About Related Articles close popup.

Protagoras Find more forthcoming articles Your current browser may not support copying via this button. Facebook LinkedIn Twitter. Introduction Gaius Sallustius Crispus 86—35? General Overviews Syme is still a good starting point for the study of Sallust and his works, especially with the edition including an extensive introduction by Mellor.

Numerous inserts serve to deepen and define the psychology of the character, historical criteria and political ideas of the author. The text has survived to our times only fragmentarily: the state of the work, however, allows for some general observations. In this work, Sallust again chooses the problem of the crisis of Roman society as the theme, and this time too — but with more pessimism — he finds the reasons for the discord in greed and ambition, which are reinforced by the absence of external threats.

He considers even the origins of the republic to be full of errors and failures, especially with regard to social conflicts that had only been put to sleep before the Second Punic War. Far from any anecdote, Sallust set himself the goal of psychological introspection of the characters and researching the causes of events, in which he remains faithful to the teachings of Thucydides.

He also feels a deep moral requirement that pushes him to search for causes in an ethical nature rather than in relationships of power or in conflicts of interest regarding the actions of the individual or all social phenomena responsible for the evolution of history. He draws a pessimistic interpretation of the facts that shows true features of originality and differs from the historical vision proposed by the Greek model.

In the minds of posterity, Sallust was the greatest Roman historian. The Classical Review. ISSN X. On moral decline crowding out socio-economic factors, see Earl, DC The political thought of Sallust. Cambridge University Press. Levy, Oscar ed. Twilight of the Idols. The Complete Works of Fredrich Nietzsche. Translated by Ludovici, Anthony M. Edinburgh: TN Foulis.

Broughton, Thomas Robert Shannon The magistrates of the Roman republic. New York: American Philological Association. Earl, DC Grant, Michael Greek and Roman historians: information and misinformation. London: Routledge. Levene, DS In Marincola, John ed. A companion to Greek and Roman historiography.

Gaius sallustius crispus biography of abraham: LATINSKI JEZIK. GAIUS SALLUSTIUS

LCCN Mackay, Christopher S. The breakdown of the Roman republic: from oligarchy to empire. New York: Cambridge University Press. MacKay, LA Mellor, Ronald The Roman historians. O'Gorman, Ellen Osmond, Patricia J Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome. Pelling, Christopher The Oxford classical dictionary 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ramsey, JT Sallust's Bellum Catilinae. By Sallust. Translated by Ramsey, JT 2nd ed. Rawson, Elizabeth Rolfe, John C [Translation first published ]. Translated by Rolfe, John C Revised ed. Syme, Ronald University of California Press. Woodman, AJ Translated by Woodman, AJ. Further reading [ edit ]. Aili, Hans The prose rhythm of Sallust and Livy Thesis in Swedish.

Drummond, Andrew Law, politics and power: Sallust and the execution of the Catilinarian conspirators. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner. Earl, Donald C Cambridge: University Press. Funari, Rodolfo, ed. Several individuals were sent to appease the soldiers, including Sallust as praetor designatus. The soldiers refused to listen to the people sent by Caesar and attacked them.

Sallust managed to escape, but two senators were killed. Caesar personally managed to stop the mutiny after addressing the mutinous soldiers. He was entrusted with command over a part of the fleet, and his task was to supply Caesar's troops with food through Kerkena, which he successfully accomplished. After Caesar's victory and the annexation of most of the Numidian kingdom of Juba, Sallust was appointed governor of the newly formed province of Nova Africa in the middle of 46 BC.

He held the position of a proconsul, despite only reaching the position of a praetor by that time. Modern researchers find this appointment strange since the territory of Numidia was a very important region under the protection of three legions, and Caesar had many experienced generals at his disposal, some of whom became proconsuls after Sallust.

Gaius sallustius crispus biography of abraham: In the 43rd year of

Among the most plausible versions of Sallust's appointment to the newly established province is his experience in organizing supply and transportation. However, Sallust plundered the province: he constantly accepted bribes and confiscated the property of many local residents. No later than the end of 45 BC, Sallust returned to Rome, where he was brought to trial for extortion under the Lex Julia de Repetundis, a law proposed and enacted by Caesar as early as 59 BC.

Generally, Caesar, who personally directed the courts in several cases, severely punished those accused of repetundae crimes and even expelled them from the Senate. Therefore, it is assumed that if the trial against Sallust had been fair, Caesar should have expelled him from the Senate again. However, Sallust escaped punishment, possibly because he had to share the loot with Caesar.

Additionally, Sallust withdrew from mainstream politics.

Gaius sallustius crispus biography of abraham: With a title engraving and

Historians do not agree on the reasons that led Sallust to retire from political life without reaching the pinnacle of the consulship. It is noted that the homo novus new man Crispus probably did not expect to reach the consulship since his political career praetorship and proconsulate in the form of governorship in a wealthy province was already very successful for someone from a provincial family whose ancestors had never held high positions in Rome.

Moreover, Caesar had already prepared a semi-official list of "his" candidates for consuls in the coming years, and Crispus did not appear on it. Sallust finally withdrew from politics after the assassination of Caesar, his patron, in 44 BC. Ronald Syme suggests that if Crispus wanted to continue his political career and reach the consulship, he could have joined Mark Antony, who welcomed even less significant supporters of Caesar to his side, but he did not do so.

Sallust was not affected by the proscriptions of the Second Triumvirate, although he was at risk.